Developing world trials meet standards and speed drugs to market, says ACRO

By Gareth Macdonald

- Last updated on GMT

Related tags: Clinical trial

Clinical trials in the developing world meet the same standards as those in Europe and the US and are vital for accelerating drug development says the Association of Clinical Research Organisations (ACRO).

The rapid expansion of the trials sector in Asia, Africa and Central and Eastern Europe, the recent criticism of studies in India and the memory of Pfizer’s Trovan programme in Nigeria has led some to question if ethical and safety standards are being met in the developing world.

However, according to ACRO executive director Doug Peddicord these concerns are unfounded because “CROs are making sure quality and ethical standards remain consistent through out the world​.”

The ACRO report, which was commissioned in response to falling US recruitment rates, found that, in general, good clinical practice (GCP) training provided by contract research organisations (CRO) in the developed world meets with standards applied elsewhere.

The report also found that, in addition to providing a boost for the local economy, the drug development process is faster when trials are conducted in a number of countries.

One piece of analysis suggested that, due to enrolment rates, Phase III cancer trials conducted simultaneously in the US and overseas are completed around three times as fast as those only carried out in the US, 1.9 years versus 5.8 years.

Problem of perception

Despite these findings Peddicord said that that there is a problem with perception about the quality of trials in the developing world.

He suggested that: “The public will never have confidence in trials conducted in emerging regions like Asia and Latin America unless we level the playing field with the US, Canada, Western Europe and Japan.

If the entire world plays by the same rules and gets the same resources patients worldwide will benefit from life-saving drugs more quickly and more cost effectively​,” he added.

The ACRO report can be obtained here.

This conclusion is similar those of a report by George Annas, chair of the department of health law, bioethics and human rights at the Boston University School of Public Health in the US.

Annas’ finding was that the increasingly globalised clinical trials sector calls for an internationally accepted set of safety and ethical rules that can be applied to all clinical development programmes.

Like the ACRO Annas also recommended that global regulatory agencies, like European Medicines Agency (EMEA) and the US Food and Drug Admi9nistration (FDA) be given the means to conduct foreign safety inspections

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

The APAC Advantages

The APAC Advantages

Catalent Pharma Solutions | 18-Jan-2022 | Insight Guide

Over recent years, the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region has become an emerging market for pharmaceutical and biotech innovation, including clinical studies.

CellCarta - Mapping Precision Medicine

CellCarta - Mapping Precision Medicine

CellCarta | 17-Jan-2022 | Product Presentation

At CellCarta, we’re dedicated to working with our partners to further the limitless potential of precision medicine. Our broad technology offering is designed...

How a Clinical MDR Helps with Data Quality

How a Clinical MDR Helps with Data Quality

Formedix | 17-Jan-2022 | Technical / White Paper

This article covers the many ways a clinical metadata repository helps with data quality in the clinical trial process, and how it ultimately helps to...

Planning Your Preclinical Assessment

Planning Your Preclinical Assessment

Altasciences | 17-Jan-2022 | Technical / White Paper

There are many challenges associated with early drug discovery and development. Advancing your best candidate for regulatory submissions requires a careful...

Related suppliers

Follow us


View more