Ethica Picks Alion for Human Research Protection Accreditation

- Last updated on GMT

Related tags: Contract research organization, Accreditation

Ethica Picks Alion for Human Research Protection Accreditation
Ethica Clinical Research has chosen Alion for accreditation of its Human Research Protection Program (HRPP).

The Canadian contract research organization (CRO) has been accredited by the Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs (AAHRPP) – a voluntary peer-driven group that assess patient safety and ethical concerns - since 2006 and has now chosen Alion Science and Technology Corporation’s HRPP accreditation services for further endorsement.

Ethica’s President Dr. Janice Parente said in a press release: “We saw in Alion an accrediting body that better supports our mission, offers flexible, responsive service, and aligns with our business activities.”

She continued, adding: “Given the dynamic nature of the research and business environments in which we operate, we share the belief that accreditation must be an equally dynamic and evolutionary process.”

The company had considered a number of HRPP service providers, factoring in experience, governance, reputation, rigor, transparency and level of resources dedicated to their accreditation programs before selecting Alion.

The company was the first Canadian firm to gain accreditation, and the first CRO to gain it worldwide from the AAHRPP.

Since then, uptake has been slow though US CRO Celerion was awarded full accreditation last year with CEO Marjorie Speers hoping the certification would have “a ripple effect across the research enterprise and that other CROs follow the lead.”

According to the AAHRP​, the goals of accreditation are to improve the systems that protect the rights and welfare of individuals who participate in research and communicate to the public the strength of commitment to the protection of human research participants.

Accredited organisations must renew their approvals three years after the initial accreditation and five years thereafter. It is necessary to perform a self-assessment and gap analysis for both the initial application and each renewal.

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

What are the building blocks of DCTs?

What are the building blocks of DCTs?

Medable | 26-Apr-2021 | Technical / White Paper

How to create a seamless experience across eConsent, eCOA and more.

Over the past year, tremendous progress was made toward digitizing and...

How a clinical metadata repository helps with data

How a clinical metadata repository helps with data

Formedix | 22-Mar-2021 | Technical / White Paper

This article covers the various ways a clinical metadata repository helps with data quality, and in turn, with data quality in the clinical trials process....

Introduction to eLAS®

Introduction to eLAS®

Clinical Ink | 08-Mar-2021 | Product Brochure

Clinical Ink has developed a unique offering — the electronic Lupus Assessment Suite (eLAS®) to address fundamental challenges impacting systemic lupus...

Related suppliers

Follow us

Products

View more

Webinars