FDA offers final guidance on transferring clinical investigation oversight

By Zachary Brennan

- Last updated on GMT

Related tags: Institutional review board, Irb

FDA offers final guidance on transferring clinical trial oversight
The US FDA has issued final guidance on the transferring of clinical studies between IRBs (institutional review boards) in order to help ensure that serious disruptions in clinical trials are rare.

The guidance discusses the regulatory responsibilities of IRBs, clinical investigators, and sponsors when oversight of a previously approved, ongoing clinical investigation under FDA’s jurisdiction is transferred from one IRB to another IRB.

The transfer of review responsibility for a clinical investigation from one IRB to another “should be accomplished in a way that assures continuous IRB oversight with no lapse in either IRB approval or the protection of human subjects, and with minimal disruption of research activities,” the FDA says.

Such transfers of oversight may occur for a number of different reasons, such as cessation of IRB operations, consolidation of multiple IRBs into a single IRB, temporary inability of an IRB to meet its obligations, or as a result of IRB non-compliance.

The guidance provides recommendations concerning the transfer of IRB oversight from one IRB to another IRB that is not part of the same institution and recommends the transfer process be documented in a written agreement.

Such an agreement should address the studies that are being transferred; all pertinent records, such as the research protocol and significant amendments. Under FDA regulations, IRB records related to the review of a clinical investigation must be retained for at least three years after the completion of the research, and the records must be accessible for inspection and copying by FDA.

Other items worth considering in an agreement include the date for the transfer, whether consent forms need to be revised, notification of the key parties and an update of the IRB registration information.

The guidance also addresses the transfer of oversight from one IRB to another IRB operating within the same institution, the temporary transfer of clinical investigation oversight to another IRB that occurs as a result of a natural disaster or for other reasons, and the transfer of a clinical investigation to a new research site requiring IRB review.

The IRB guidance comes as the FDA has previously focused its efforts on IRB responsibilities​ in checking investigator qualifications, ensuring sites are up to code, and investigating whether an IND is necessary for a proposed trial. 

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Automating clinical trials for success

Automating clinical trials for success

Formedix | 06-Oct-2021 | Technical / White Paper

This article gives gives a brief overview of why automation is absolutely essential for clinical trial success.

What should a clinical metadata repository do?

What should a clinical metadata repository do?

Formedix | 26-Jul-2021 | Technical / White Paper

Choosing a clinical metadata repository (MDR) software can be a tough task as the capabilities and features of your chosen MDR could make or break your...

Adapting supply chains to new ways of working

Adapting supply chains to new ways of working

World Courier | 15-Jul-2021 | Technical / White Paper

COVID-19 has changed the way we operate. We have adapted our supply chain solutions to meet our clients’ requirements while following World Courier standard...

Empowering Clinical Trial Sponsors with Analytics

Empowering Clinical Trial Sponsors with Analytics

PerkinElmer | 14-Jul-2021 | Technical / White Paper

Is your Clinical Data Review creating problems or solving them? Take Control of Your Data. PerkinElmer Informatics Clinical Solutions, powered by Tibco...

Related suppliers

Follow us

Products

View more

Webinars