FDA's wearables guidance could slow pharma adoption in short-term, says analyst

By Dan Stanton contact

- Last updated on GMT

General wellness wearables discussed in new US FDA draft guidance
General wellness wearables discussed in new US FDA draft guidance

Related tags: Pharma companies, Medicine

Draft guidance distinguishing wearable medical devices from ‘general wellness’ devices could slow pharma’s adoption of such data in the short-term, according to an analyst.

The draft guidance​ covers “general wellness”​ devices, defined as devices which maintain or encourage a general state of health or claim that they help to reduce the risk or impact of certain chronic diseases or conditions, including such apps as weight management, physical fitness and mental acuity.

But while this guidance is more focused on so-called low risk general wellness products (one example being a “mobile application [that] plays music to soothe and relax an individual and to manage stress”​), there could be some implications for the pharma world.

The advent of mobile technology has not skipped pharma: Just this week Novartis teamed up with Qualcomm Life​ to use wearable technology in clinical trials, and GlaxoSmithKline recently partnered with Medidata​ over a cloud-based trial data tool.

Research Analyst with Juniper Research James Moar told this publication the new guidance is unlikely to affect companies like Qualcomm directly, as they only provide the platform to store the information generated by the devices, rather than the devices themselves.

However, “it will ultimately limit or segregate the market for platforms like [Qualcomm’s] 2net that are aiming to be explicitly medical in focus, as they will have to separate wellness data and specific health-related data, such as blood sugar levels for diabetics.”

He added this will hamper efforts to create unified electronic health records (EHRs), as they could feasibly contain both medical and wellness data, “but companies are aware that the revenues from building platforms explicitly for medical use will ultimately be very large.

“In the short term this will slow the adoption of wearables-generated data by pharma companies, as there is now specific limits on what types of information can have medical use.”

However, he continued, in the long run “it will give pharma companies an advantage over newer wearables-based players, as they are more familiar with the regulatory environment for medical usage, allowing them to pick technology partners they think will help their development into wearables, rather than having to defend against wearables-based competition.”

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

What are the building blocks of DCTs?

What are the building blocks of DCTs?

Medable | 26-Apr-2021 | Technical / White Paper

How to create a seamless experience across eConsent, eCOA and more.

Over the past year, tremendous progress was made toward digitizing and...

How a clinical metadata repository helps with data

How a clinical metadata repository helps with data

Formedix | 22-Mar-2021 | Technical / White Paper

This article covers the various ways a clinical metadata repository helps with data quality, and in turn, with data quality in the clinical trials process....

Introduction to eLAS®

Introduction to eLAS®

Clinical Ink | 08-Mar-2021 | Product Brochure

Clinical Ink has developed a unique offering — the electronic Lupus Assessment Suite (eLAS®) to address fundamental challenges impacting systemic lupus...

Related suppliers

Follow us


View more