Bad data: new methods needed to catch errors in clinical trials

By Melissa Fassbender contact

- Last updated on GMT

Image: iStock
Image: iStock

Related tags: Clinical trial

About 2% of researchers admit to data manipulation, but this figure may be much higher and a new method is being sought to detect flawed data.

We do not yet know how often scientists misbehave​,” says Chris Hartgerink, a researcher from the Tilburg University, The Netherlands. However, inaccurate data is not always the result of misbehavior – often, it is the product of human error or poor data handling.

Thus, Hartgerink is leading a new Dutch Fulbright proposal that seeks to provide additional quality control layers for clinical trial results reported in the ClinicalTrials.gov database.

Many people complain about pharma​,” he says, then asking, “Do the numbers with respect to data fabrication support or disconfirm their complaints​?”

In the pharmaceutical industry especially, bad data is not only costly, but life threatening

For example, beta-blockers were originally prescribed to cardiac patients to decrease perioperative mortality, but after a meta-analysis detected erroneous data in the related clinical trials, it was determined that the medication actually increased mortality risk.

When asked if he thinks the 2% response rate (of researchers who admit to manipulating data) is accurate, Hartgerink tells us, “The 2% rate is an underestimation, so no, I do not think it is accurate​.”

Actually, he thinks that the number is likely double, maybe even more; however, he admits that it is pure speculation without the research, further highlighting its importance.

The next steps

While Hartgerink isn’t currently able to suggest methods for tacking reporting issues (his research proposal is about finding these new methods) he does explain they all apply the same principal: “People (including scientists) cannot properly process probabilities, and this will reflect itself in the data. If groups are randomly assigned, they should not show differences prior to an intervention, for example​.”

The systematic reporting in the ClinicalTrials.gov database will facilitate the application of these methods – the next step is to carry out the research proposed in the project to develop the new approaches.

According to Hartgerink, The proposal has been submitted, but the team does not know yet if they will receive funding, without which they will be unable to complete their research.

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

How clinical trial software can optimize trials

How clinical trial software can optimize trials

Formedix | 09-Jun-2021 | Technical / White Paper

This article explains the different types of clinical trial software available, and how it can be used to optimize the end to end clinical trials design...

Adapting supply chains to new ways of working

Adapting supply chains to new ways of working

World Courier | 01-Jun-2021 | Technical / White Paper

COVID-19 has changed the way we operate. We have adapted our supply chain solutions to meet our clients’ requirements while following World Courier standard...

What are the building blocks of DCTs?

What are the building blocks of DCTs?

Medable | 26-Apr-2021 | Technical / White Paper

How to create a seamless experience across eConsent, eCOA and more.

Over the past year, tremendous progress was made toward digitizing and...

How a clinical metadata repository helps with data

How a clinical metadata repository helps with data

Formedix | 22-Mar-2021 | Technical / White Paper

This article covers the various ways a clinical metadata repository helps with data quality, and in turn, with data quality in the clinical trials process....

Related suppliers

Follow us

Products

View more

Webinars