EFPIA welcomes EMA guidelines

EMA sets clear rules for drug firms seeking clinical data redactions

By Gareth Macdonald contact

- Last updated on GMT

EMA clear on clinical trial data redactions
EMA clear on clinical trial data redactions

Related tags: Pharmaceutical industry

Drugmakers seeking to stop “commercially confidential information” being made public in trial reports will need to demonstrate the likely economic harm publishing it would cause says the EMA.

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) made the comments in guidelines​ designed to help marketing authorization holders comply with its policy​ on trial data dissemination.

The document – published on March 2​ – details how drug firms should submit clinical reports, how they should make patient-level data anonymous and when they can ask for commercially confidential information to be redacted.

Clinical trial data redaction is a controversial subject. The agency has faced both challenges​ from companies concerned sharing data would benefit rivals and criticism from European Ombudsman Emily O’Reilly​ about information it has allowed to be omitted to date.

In the guidance the EMA stresses that “the vast majority of the information contained in clinical reports is not considered CCI (commercially confidential information).​” It also warned that drugmakers should not routinely make redaction requests every time the submit a study.


Instead, the agency said “redaction proposals based on grounds of CCI must be backed up by the applicant/MAH with a specific and clear justification.”

The justification must specify the precise information, set out how it is innovative and “explain how the disclosure of the information concerned would undermine the applicant’s/MAH’s legitimate economic interest.”

Drug companies will not be able to seek redactions for information that is already publically available, common knowledge or if its publication is in the public interest.

The first set of reports is due to be published in September 2016.

Industry backing

Drug industry group EFPIA told us: "We welcome the publication of the guidance by the EMA, as this now clarifies expectations of companies and allows them to progress activities to implement EMA’s Policy 0070. 

"We also welcome the fact that EMA has taken on board some of the feedback provided by industry during its consultations in 2015, such as allowing companies some flexibility in the format of presentation of redacted clinical study reports. 

EFPIA added that: "As is acknowledged in the guidance, this is a new undertaking: the initial operational implementation will be a learning process, so we can expect that challenges and questions will arise.  We look forward continued cooperation with the EMA to ensure that their Policy is implemented in the most efficient manne​r."

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

What are the building blocks of DCTs?

What are the building blocks of DCTs?

Medable | 26-Apr-2021 | Technical / White Paper

How to create a seamless experience across eConsent, eCOA and more.

Over the past year, tremendous progress was made toward digitizing and...

How a clinical metadata repository helps with data

How a clinical metadata repository helps with data

Formedix | 22-Mar-2021 | Technical / White Paper

This article covers the various ways a clinical metadata repository helps with data quality, and in turn, with data quality in the clinical trials process....

Introduction to eLAS®

Introduction to eLAS®

Clinical Ink | 08-Mar-2021 | Product Brochure

Clinical Ink has developed a unique offering — the electronic Lupus Assessment Suite (eLAS®) to address fundamental challenges impacting systemic lupus...

Related suppliers

Follow us


View more