Re-inspection lands Dr Reddy’s Form 483 with 13 observations at Duvvada plant

By Dan Stanton contact

- Last updated on GMT

Image: iStock/Golden_Brown
Image: iStock/Golden_Brown

Related tags: Dr reddy, Food and drug administration, Andhra pradesh

Dr Reddy’s Laboratories says it is addressing the observations at its Duvvada plant which was hit with a warning letter in 2015.

In a Bombay Stock Exchange filing, Dr Reddy’s Laboratories announced an audit at its Duvvada, Visakhapatnam facility – in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh – was completed today and resulted in a Form 483 with 13 observations.

Spokesman Calvin Printer told in-Pharmatechnologist.com the visit by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was a re-inspection after the plant was subject to a warning letter​ in November 2015.

“Our priority is to respond to the observations as fast as we can,”​ he told us, though was unable to divulge details of the Agency’s criticisms. “We are still in the process of validating the observations.”

The firm has 15 business days to reply to the FDA.

Previous warning

The Duvvada plant, a finished formulation facility for oncology drugs, was one of three Indian sites hit with the 2015 warning; the other two were active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) facilities in Srikakulam (also in Andhra Pradesh) and Tripuraram (Telangana).

Last month​, the Miryalaguda, Tripuraram plant was issued with an FDA Form 483 with three observations, following a re-inspection.

The FDA found significant violations of cGMP at Duvvada. These included malfunction of equipment, an example being an operator repeatedly using forceps to manually assist the transportation of vials along a conveyor belt.

“You did not simulate these critical manual interventions during media fills, so you have no basis to know whether they may compromise the sterility of your products,”​ the Agency said at the time.

 “Even though your senior management was notified of this failure, you did not initiate an incident report to investigate the equipment malfunction or determine the effects of this discrepancy on the quality of the product until we concluded our inspection and issued a Form 483.”

The Agency also cited failures in following written procedures designed to prevent microbiological contamination of drug products purporting to be sterile, and written procedures in production and process controls designed to ensure purity.

“Parenteral drugs must be essentially free of particulates. However, during the inspection, we observed that your procedure for qualifying the operators who perform visual inspection is unacceptable because you did not document the creation of inspectors’ qualification kits.”

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Vaccine Innovation in the Era of COVID19

Vaccine Innovation in the Era of COVID19

Covance Patient Safety | 01-Oct-2020 | Sponsored Link

During this time of worldwide crisis, there is an increasing demand for the acceleration of a vaccination for COVID19. Regardless of the great recent advancements...

Strategies to Achieve Successful Approval & Launch

Strategies to Achieve Successful Approval & Launch

Catalent Pharma Solutions | 03-Sep-2020 | Data Sheet

There are several key considerations to how companies should approach commercial-scale manufacturing that may aid the success of their biologic’s launch...

Lactium, your ally to manage day to day stress

Lactium, your ally to manage day to day stress

Ingredia | 27-Aug-2020 | Product Presentation

Stress has been called the ‘health epidemic of the 21st century’ by the World Health Organization. Increasingly, consumers are looking for safe, reliable...

Related suppliers

Follow us

Products

View more

Webinars