Bioethics International reveals index to score pharma on trial diversity

By Ben Hargreaves

- Last updated on GMT

© Rawpixel / Getty Images
© Rawpixel / Getty Images

Related tags diversity Clinical trials

The not-for-profit organization published its fair inclusion score to measure and rank pharmaceutical companies on their inclusion of women, older adults, and racial and ethnic minoritized patients.

The fair inclusion score was created by Bioethics International in collaboration with researchers from Yale and Stanford University, and it becomes the first benchmark for clinical trial equality, diversity, and inclusivity.

The score is informed by transparency and inclusivity data collected from 64 clinical trials of novel drugs and biologics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for oncologic conditions between 2012 and 2017.

Taken into consideration are the transparency of reporting and the representation of three demographic groups that are often underrepresented in clinical trials: sex (percentage of participants that were female), age (percentage of adults older than 64) and race/ethnicity (percentage of participants identifying as Black, Asian and/or Latinx).

All of these factors are then combined to create an inclusion score, which was applied to 25 different companies.

The results of these ranking were published in an article in BMJ Medicine​, which found that the reporting of diversity data varied dramatically across the different criteria. Sex was reported by all 25 sponsors, while only 40% reported age, and 24% reported race and ethnicity.

Once the available data was examined, the scale of work left to be done on diversity was revealed: only 56% of sponsors had adequate representation of women in trials, 24% adequately represented older adults, and 16% adequately represented racially and ethnically minoritized patients.

Across the 25 companies examined in the study, the overall fair inclusion score was 81%. However, the median company score for inclusion of racially and ethnically minoritized patients was 68%. United Therapeutics was the only company scoring 100%.

The study acknowledged that there were limitations of its research, highlighting that its focus on oncology therapeutics in the US might not generalize to other products or countries. The authors also highlighted that the product sample size per sponsor is small and therefore could be highly influenced by a single product.

Jennifer Miller, founder of Bioethics International, an associate professor in Yale School of Medicine, and senior author of the study, said, “The purpose of the fair inclusion score is to provide companies and industry partners with a metric to assess how well companies are doing improving clinical trial diversity. Some companies are doing well, and we want to highlight that and learn from them, while pushing the industry to do better.”

The industry has been making efforts in recent years to address the lack of diversity in clinical trials. More funding is going into the space, as companies offering solutions receive more backing​, and pharma companies​ themselves are upping spending.

Related news

Related products

show more

How a Clinical MDR Helps with Data Quality

How a Clinical MDR Helps with Data Quality

Formedix | 16-Jan-2023 | Technical / White Paper

This article covers the many ways a clinical metadata repository helps with data quality in the clinical trial process, and how it ultimately helps to...

Optimizing Adherence in DCTs

Optimizing Adherence in DCTs

PPD - Decentralized Clinical Trials | 12-Jan-2023 | Technical / White Paper

Prioritizing greater patient-centricity and creating an opportunity to reach unprecedented patient groups, decentralized and hybrid clinical trials are...

PPD is Supporting Complex EU DCTs

PPD is Supporting Complex EU DCTs

PPD - Decentralized Clinical Trials | 05-Jan-2023 | Technical / White Paper

PPD supports European DCTs and clinical trial sponsors with a holistic and comprehensive approach

What should a clinical metadata repository do?

What should a clinical metadata repository do?

Formedix | 14-Dec-2022 | Technical / White Paper

Choosing a clinical metadata repository (MDR) software can be a tough task as the capabilities and features of your chosen MDR could make or break your...

Related suppliers

Follow us


View more